Assessing the Accuracy and Reproducibility of PARIETAL: A Deep Learning Brain Extraction Algorithm
dc.contributor.author
dc.date.accessioned
2021-06-22T12:01:47Z
dc.date.available
2021-06-22T12:01:47Z
dc.date.issued
2024-05-09
dc.identifier.issn
1053-1807
dc.identifier.uri
dc.description.abstract
Background
Manual brain extraction from magnetic resonance (MR) images is time-consuming and prone to intra- and inter-rater variability. Several automated approaches have been developed to alleviate these constraints, including deep learning pipelines. However, these methods tend to reduce their performance in unseen magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scanner vendors and different imaging protocols.
Purpose
To present and evaluate for clinical use PARIETAL, a pre-trained deep learning brain extraction method. We compare its reproducibility in a scan/rescan analysis and its robustness among scanners of different manufacturers.
Study Type
Retrospective.
Population
Twenty-one subjects (12 women) with age range 22–48 years acquired using three different MRI scanner machines including scan/rescan in each of them.
Field Strength/Sequence
T1-weighted images acquired in a 3-T Siemens with magnetization prepared rapid gradient-echo sequence and two 1.5 T scanners, Philips and GE, with spin-echo and spoiled gradient-recalled (SPGR) sequences, respectively.
Assessment
Analysis of the intracranial cavity volumes obtained for each subject on the three different scanners and the scan/rescan acquisitions.
Statistical Tests
Parametric permutation tests of the differences in volumes to rank and statistically evaluate the performance of PARIETAL compared to state-of-the-art methods.
Results
The mean absolute intracranial volume differences obtained by PARIETAL in the scan/rescan analysis were 1.88 mL, 3.91 mL, and 4.71 mL for Siemens, GE, and Philips scanners, respectively. PARIETAL was the best-ranked method on Siemens and GE scanners, while decreasing to Rank 2 on the Philips images. Intracranial differences for the same subject between scanners were 5.46 mL, 27.16 mL, and 30.44 mL for GE/Philips, Siemens/Philips, and Siemens/GE comparison, respectively. The permutation tests revealed that PARIETAL was always in Rank 1, obtaining the most similar volumetric results between scanners.
Data Conclusion
PARIETAL accurately segments the brain and it generalizes to images acquired at different sites without the need of training or fine-tuning it again. PARIETAL is publicly available
dc.description.sponsorship
This work has been partially supported by DPI2017-86696-R from the Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades. Albert Clèrigues also holds a FPI grant PRE2018-083507. The authors gratefully acknowledge the support of the NVIDIA Corporation with their donation of the TITAN X GPU used in this research
Open Access funding provided thanks to the CRUE-CSIC agreement with Wiley
dc.format.mimetype
application/pdf
dc.language.iso
eng
dc.publisher
Wiley
dc.relation
info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/AEI/Plan Estatal de Investigación Científica y Técnica y de Innovación 2013-2016/DPI2017-86696-R/ES/MODELOS PREDICTIVOS PARA LA ESCLEROSIS MULTIPE USANDO BIOMARCADORES DE RESONANCIA MAGNETICA DEL CEREBRO/
dc.relation.isformatof
Reproducció digital del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.27776
dc.relation.ispartof
Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 2024, vol. 59, núm. 6, p. 1991-2000
dc.relation.ispartofseries
Articles publicats (D-ATC)
dc.rights
Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International
dc.rights.uri
dc.subject
dc.title
Assessing the Accuracy and Reproducibility of PARIETAL: A Deep Learning Brain Extraction Algorithm
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.rights.accessRights
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.type.version
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.identifier.doi
dc.identifier.idgrec
033549
dc.contributor.funder
dc.type.peerreviewed
peer-reviewed
dc.relation.FundingProgramme
dc.relation.ProjectAcronym
dc.identifier.eissn
1522-2586