La carga de la prueba en el CGP de Colombia
Texto Completo
Compartir
The burden of proof is an universal law institution that includes two fundamental
aspects: first, it is a parties rule behavior that answers the question of who has to prove; and
second, it is a judge’s interpretation rule to know against who decides to when there aren’t
evidence of the factual basics.
This article's mean objective is to review the burden of proof controversies and its
regulation in article 167 of the CGP in Colombia. Therefore, it starts with the exposition of
different activities and behavior of the legal procedure relation; then, it examines the
historical context, from the antique epoch to nowadays; and, for that reason it concludes that
who affirms a fact must prove it.
Hence, it studies the actual polemics about the idea of eliminating the burden of proof
total or partiality and questions the judge’s possibility of requiring the proof to the party with
the most favorable position to provide.
Este documento está sujeto a una licencia Creative Commons:Reconocimiento - No comercial - Sin obra derivada (by-nc-nd)
![Creative Commons by-nc-nd4.0](/themes/BiblioUdG/images/creative-commons-by-nc-nd.png)
Localització