Doppler ultrasound in the measurement of pulse wave velocity: agreement with the Complior method
dc.contributor.author
dc.date.accessioned
2013-02-04T09:15:38Z
dc.date.available
2013-02-04T09:15:38Z
dc.date.issued
2011
dc.identifier.issn
1476-7120
dc.identifier.uri
dc.description.abstract
Aortic stiffness is an independent predictor factor for cardiovascular risk. Different methods for determining pulse wave velocity (PWV) are used, among which the most common are mechanical methods such as SphygmoCor or Complior, which require specific devices and are limited by technical difficulty in obtaining measurements. Doppler guided by 2D ultrasound is a good alternative to these methods. We studied 40 patients (29 male, aged 21 to 82 years) comparing the Complior method with Doppler. Agreement of both devices was high (R = 0.91, 0.84-0.95, 95% CI). The reproducibility analysis revealed no intra-nor interobserver differences. Based on these results, we conclude that Doppler ultrasound is a reliable and reproducible alternative to other established methods for themeasurement of aortic PWV
dc.format.mimetype
application/pdf
dc.language.iso
eng
dc.publisher
BioMed Central
dc.relation.isformatof
Reproducció digital del document publicat a: http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1476-7120-9-13
dc.relation.ispartof
Cardiovascular Ultrasound, 2011, vol. 9, núm. 13
dc.relation.ispartofseries
Articles publicats (D-CM)
dc.rights
Attribution 2.0 Spain
dc.rights.uri
dc.subject
dc.title
Doppler ultrasound in the measurement of pulse wave velocity: agreement with the Complior method
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.rights.accessRights
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.type.version
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.identifier.doi
dc.identifier.idgrec
017686
dc.identifier.eissn
1476-7120