DUGiDocsReply to the comments on epistemic ambitions of the criminal trial: truth, proof and rights
dc.contributor.author
dc.date.accessioned
2024-02-08T10:20:56Z
dc.date.available
2024-02-08T10:20:56Z
dc.date.issued
2024-01-31
dc.identifier.issn
2660-4515
dc.identifier.uri
dc.description.abstract
This article sets out to reply to the comments by Antony Duff, Sabine Gless, John Jack-son and Thomas Weigend on my article «Epistemic Ambitions of the Criminal Trial». It begins by examining the various positions of the commentators to the question of the aim(s) of the criminal trial before going on to consider the limits of instrumentalist and proceduralist approaches and to re-examine the right-based conception of trials. It concludes by considering the implications of this account of criminal trials
dc.format.mimetype
application/pdf
dc.language.iso
eng
dc.publisher
Universitat de Girona
Marcial Pons
dc.relation.isformatof
Reproducció digital del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.33115/udg_bib/qf.i6.22992
dc.relation.ispartof
Quaestio facti: revista internacional sobre razonamiento probatorio, 2024, núm.6, p. 237-247
dc.relation.ispartofseries
QF, núm. 06 (2024)
dc.rights
Attribution 4.0 International
dc.rights.uri
dc.subject
dc.title
Reply to the comments on epistemic ambitions of the criminal trial: truth, proof and rights
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.rights.accessRights
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.type.version
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.identifier.doi
dc.type.peerreviewed
peer-reviewed
dc.identifier.eissn
2604-6202
dc.description.ods
10. Reduced Inequality
16. Peace and Justice Strong Institutions