Resistance but not recovery is related to the role of specialist taxa in river communities submitted to hydric stress
dc.contributor.author
dc.date.accessioned
2023-02-22T08:07:53Z
dc.date.available
2023-02-22T08:07:53Z
dc.date.issued
2023-05-01
dc.identifier.issn
0048-9697
dc.identifier.uri
dc.description.abstract
One of the main effects of global change is the human interference in the global water cycle, which alters river hydrological dynamics and submits their biological communities to hydric stress. Hydric stress is a pulse disturbance with potential multiple effects on biodiversity and functions in river ecosystems. The presence of habitat specialists may support the response of biological communities to pulse disturbances, maintaining ecological functions more consistently than other communities only having generalists. We tested this general hypothesis in stream communities submitted to increasing hydric stress (normal conditions vs humidity vs desiccation). We used communities with variable proportion of specialist algal and cyanobacterial taxa and tested their resistance to hydric stress by analyzing potential changes on their number of species, biovolume, proportion of intact cells, and photosynthetic variables (basal fluorescence, photosynthetic yield). We also evaluated the recovery of ecological functions (net community primary production, community respiration, phosphorus uptake) once hydric stress conditions ended. Hydric stress caused a slight decrease in the number of species and biovolume of assemblages, but the proportion of intact cells did not significantly change because of the disturbance. Basal fluorescence and photosynthetic yield under hydric stress decreased more markedly in communities without specialist taxa, while communities with habitat specialists resisted better. Metabolism did not remarkably decrease under moderate hydric stress, but dropped by half under desiccation in all communities, having or not specialist taxa. Overall, specialist taxa did provide higher resistance to stress but did not support a distinct recovery of ecological functions. We suggest that this characteristic response is related to the high plasticity of biofilm structures
dc.description.sponsorship
This research was funded by the project RIVSTRESS (PID2020-115708RB-C22). ICRA researchers acknowledge funding from the CERCA program and the support through the Consolidated Research Group ICRA-ENV 2021 SGR 01282. AF acknowledges the Juan de la Cierva program (IJC2019-039181-I) funded by MCIN/AEI
Open Access funding provided thanks to the CRUE-CSIC agreement with Elsevier
dc.format.mimetype
application/pdf
dc.language.iso
eng
dc.publisher
Elsevier
dc.relation.isformatof
Reproducció digital del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.161952
dc.relation.ispartof
Science of The Total Environment, 2023, vol. 871, art.núm. 161952
dc.relation.ispartofseries
Articles publicats (D-CCAA)
dc.rights
Attribution 4.0 International
dc.rights.uri
dc.subject
dc.title
Resistance but not recovery is related to the role of specialist taxa in river communities submitted to hydric stress
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.rights.accessRights
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.type.version
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.identifier.doi
dc.type.peerreviewed
peer-reviewed
dc.identifier.eissn
1879-1026
dc.description.ods
6. Agua limpia y saneamiento