DUGiDocsHow to Theorize about Statistical Evidence (and Really, about Everything Else): A comment on Allen
dc.contributor.author
dc.date.accessioned
2021-03-05T07:14:04Z
dc.date.available
2021-03-05T07:14:04Z
dc.date.issued
2021-01-01
dc.identifier.issn
2660-4515
dc.identifier.uri
dc.description.abstract
In responding to Prof. Allen’s paper, I make several general methodological points: about
the use of hypothetical cases, about the point of theorizing, and about the role of idealization.
Then I make some more specific points about his claims about (and against) previous work on
statistical evidence
dc.format.mimetype
application/pdf
dc.language.iso
eng
dc.publisher
Universitat de Girona. Càtedra de Cultura Jurídica
Marcial Pons
dc.relation.isformatof
Reproducció digital del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.33115/udg_bib/qf.i2.22455
dc.relation.ispartof
Quaestio facti: revista internacional sobre razonamiento probatorio, 2021, núm.2, p. 285-298
dc.relation.ispartofseries
QF, vol. 02 (2021)
dc.rights
Reconeixement 4.0 Internacional
dc.rights.uri
dc.title
How to Theorize about Statistical Evidence (and Really, about Everything Else): A comment on Allen
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.rights.accessRights
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.type.version
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.identifier.doi
dc.type.peerreviewed
peer-reviewed
dc.identifier.eissn
2604-6202