Efficacy evaluation of clinical prediction rules to reduce diagnostic time of venous thromboembolism in the emergency department: a quasi-experimental study
Full Text
Share
Background: venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a habitual urgency attended most frequently in
emergency departments. It is the third cause of cardiovascular disease and its main
manifestations are deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism. VTE has severe complications
and can be life-threatening. That is why a fast and accurate diagnosis is needed. To ensure it,
there exist clinical prediction rules that combined with diagnostic algorithms, make diagnosis
safer and reduces the number of false-positive and false-negative results. Nevertheless, it is been
demonstrated that these diagnostic recommendations are not followed for physicians although
they have been validated as the most accurate strategy.
Justification: lack of use of clinical prediction rules lead to a clinical practice that is not as safe as
when they are used as well as an overuse of unnecessary diagnostic tests (that have important
secondary effects such as radiation). One of the main causes for physicians to not using them may
be the lack of awareness and training regarding clinical pre-test probability assessment with these
scores. This is the reason why the study intervention will be the implementation of VTE diagnosis
formation which will be carried in Hospital Universitari Josep Trueta.
Objectives: the main purpose of this study is to demonstrate if the use of clinical prediction rules
(Wells score) reduces patients’ time spent until they are correctly diagnosed. Secondarily, this
study will assess whether the application of Wells score reduces the number of complementary
requests in patients with suspected VTE.
Methodology: our study is designed as a quasi-experimental before and after evaluation that will
be conducted in the emergency department of Hospital Universitari Josep Trueta between
November 2019 – November 2022. Formation intervention will be implemented to physicians
who work in the emergency department to improve VTE diagnostic process. A non-probabilistic
consecutive sampling will be used and there will be needed a 316 patient’s recruitment, needing
158 patient’s recruitment in each period (pre and post-intervention). Time until achieving VTE
diagnosis before and after the intervention will be assessed and compared to determine the
impact of the intervention. Statistical analysis will be adjusted for possible confounding variables
This document is licensed under a Creative Commons:Attribution - Non commercial - No Derivate Works (by-nc-nd)

Localització