Long-Term Glucose Forecasting Using a Physiological Model and Deconvolution of the Continuous Glucose Monitoring Signal
Text Complet
Compartir
Blood glucose forecasting in type 1 diabetes (T1D) management is a
maturing field with numerous algorithms being published and a few of them having reached the
commercialisation stage. However, accurate long-term glucose predictions (e.g., >60 min), which
are usually needed in applications such as precision insulin dosing (e.g., an artificial pancreas),
still remain a challenge. In this paper, we present a novel glucose forecasting algorithm that is
well-suited for long-term prediction horizons. The proposed algorithm is currently being used as
the core component of a modular safety system for an insulin dose recommender developed within
the EU-funded PEPPER (Patient Empowerment through Predictive PERsonalised decision support)
project. (2) Methods: The proposed blood glucose forecasting algorithm is based on a compartmental
composite model of glucose–insulin dynamics, which uses a deconvolution technique applied to
the continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) signal for state estimation. In addition to commonly
employed inputs by glucose forecasting methods (i.e., CGM data, insulin, carbohydrates), the
proposed algorithm allows the optional input of meal absorption information to enhance prediction
accuracy. Clinical data corresponding to 10 adult subjects with T1D were used for evaluation
purposes. In addition, in silico data obtained with a modified version of the UVa-Padova simulator
was used to further evaluate the impact of accounting for meal absorption information on prediction
accuracy. Finally, a comparison with two well-established glucose forecasting algorithms, the
autoregressive exogenous (ARX) model and the latent variable-based statistical (LVX) model, was
carried out. (3) Results: For prediction horizons beyond 60 min, the performance of the proposed
physiological model-based (PM) algorithm is superior to that of the LVX and ARX algorithms.
When comparing the performance of PM against the secondly ranked method (ARX) on a 120 min
prediction horizon, the percentage improvement on prediction accuracy measured with the root
mean square error, A-region of error grid analysis (EGA), and hypoglycaemia prediction calculated
by the Matthews correlation coefficient, was 18.8%, 17.9%, and 80.9%, respectively. Although
showing a trend towards improvement, the addition of meal absorption information did not provide
clinically significant improvements. (4) Conclusion: The proposed glucose forecasting algorithm is
potentially well-suited for T1D management applications which require long-term glucose predictions