DUGiDocsSome comments on compositional data analysis in archaeometry, in particular the fallacies in Tangri and Wright's dismissal of logratio analysis
dc.contributor.author
dc.date.accessioned
2018-11-22T09:13:11Z
dc.date.available
2018-11-22T09:13:11Z
dc.date.issued
2002-01-01
dc.identifier.issn
0003-813X
dc.identifier.uri
dc.description.abstract
This comment exposes the fallacies in the Tangri and Wright (1993) dismissal of the methodology of logratio analysis of compositional data as dangerous surgery. It suggests that compositional data analysts should pay enough attention to the basic nature of compositional data and some elementary principles underlying coherent study in order to avoid meaningless inferences
dc.format.mimetype
application/pdf
dc.language.iso
eng
dc.publisher
Wiley
dc.relation.isformatof
Versió postprint del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-4754.t01-1-00061
dc.relation.ispartof
© Archaeometry, 2002, vol. 44, núm. 2, p. 295-304
dc.relation.ispartofseries
Articles publicats (D-IMA)
dc.rights
Tots els drets reservats
dc.subject
dc.title
Some comments on compositional data analysis in archaeometry, in particular the fallacies in Tangri and Wright's dismissal of logratio analysis
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.rights.accessRights
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.type.version
info:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion
dc.identifier.doi
dc.identifier.idgrec
003496
dc.type.peerreviewed
peer-reviewed
dc.identifier.eissn
1475-4754