Networks of PhD Students and Academic Performance: A Comparison across Countries

DSpace/Manakin Repository

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Capó Artigues, Aina Maria
dc.contributor.author Coromina Soler, Lluís
dc.contributor.author Ferligoj, Anuska
dc.contributor.author Matelic, Uros
dc.contributor.author Coenders, Germà
dc.date.issued 2007
dc.identifier.citation Capó, A., Coromina, L., Ferligoj, A., Matelic, U., i Coenders, G. (2007). Netowrks of PhD students and academic performance: a comparison across countries. Metodoloski Zvezki, 4, 2, 205-217. Recuperat 19 març 2010, a http://mrvar.fdv.uni-lj.si/pub/mz/
dc.identifier.issn 1854-0031
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10256/2083
dc.description.abstract In this article we compare regression models obtained to predict PhD students’ academic performance in the universities of Girona (Spain) and Slovenia. Explanatory variables are characteristics of PhD student’s research group understood as an egocentered social network, background and attitudinal characteristics of the PhD students and some characteristics of the supervisors. Academic performance was measured by the weighted number of publications. Two web questionnaires were designed, one for PhD students and one for their supervisors and other research group members. Most of the variables were easily comparable across universities due to the careful translation procedure and pre-tests. When direct comparison was not possible we created comparable indicators. We used a regression model in which the country was introduced as a dummy coded variable including all possible interaction effects. The optimal transformations of the main and interaction variables are discussed. Some differences between Slovenian and Girona universities emerge. Some variables like supervisor’s performance and motivation for autonomy prior to starting the PhD have the same positive effect on the PhD student’s performance in both countries. On the other hand, variables like too close supervision by the supervisor and having children have a negative influence in both countries. However, we find differences between countries when we observe the motivation for research prior to starting the PhD which increases performance in Slovenia but not in Girona. As regards network variables, frequency of supervisor advice increases performance in Slovenia and decreases it in Girona. The negative effect in Girona could be explained by the fact that additional contacts of the PhD student with his/her supervisor might indicate a higher workload in addition to or instead of a better advice about the dissertation. The number of external student’s advice relationships and social support mean contact intensity are not significant in Girona, but they have a negative effect in Slovenia. We might explain the negative effect of external advice relationships in Slovenia by saying that a lot of external advice may actually result from a lack of the more relevant internal advice
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf
dc.language.iso eng
dc.publisher University of Ljubljana - Faculty of Social Sciences
dc.relation.ispartof © Metodoloski Zvezki, 2007, vol. 4, núm. 2, p. 205-217
dc.relation.ispartofseries Articles publicats (D-EC)
dc.rights Tots els drets reservats
dc.subject Anàlisi de regressió
dc.subject Ciències socials -- Mètodes estadístics
dc.subject Regression analysis
dc.subject Estudiants universitaris
dc.subject College students
dc.subject Social science -- Statistical methods
dc.title Networks of PhD Students and Academic Performance: A Comparison across Countries
dc.type info:eu-repo/semantics/article


Files in this item

 

Show simple item record

Related Items

Search DUGiDocs


Browse

My Account

Statistics

Impact

This file is restricted

The file you are attempting to access is a restricted file and requires credentials to view. Please login below to access the file.

  1. We will contact you via the email address you have provided us.